|
Project Feasibility Analysis
|
Submitted to |
: |
[Client] |
|
Submitted by |
: |
GentTac Enterprises, LLC |
|
Consultants |
: |
Alson Lee / Lowell
Bennett |
|
Subject
|
: |
Restaurant Inception, Frank Ogawa
Plaza, Oakland, Calif. |
_____________________________________
Project Premise
– The establishment of a full service food and beverage dining house
near the terminus of San Pablo Avenue, fronting the 1.5 acre Frank Ogawa
City Hall Plaza, an open space and terraced amphitheater at the revitalized
core of downtown Oakland, California.
Site Abstract
–
-
Current
Status of Project: Shell under construction with interior architectural
plans complete.
-
Projected
Date of Business Opening: Spring, 2001.
-
Total
Interior Space: Per existing plans, 2,636 square feet, plus a lower
basement level of lesser square footage, which includes storage, office
and prep kitchen.
-
Total
First Floor Non-Dining Area: Per existing plans, 1,469 square feet,
including kitchen and restrooms.
-
Total
First Floor Dining Area: Per existing plans, 1,115 square feet.
-
Total
Interior Capacity: Per existing plans, 56 patrons.
Location Features
– The site is situated literally at the geographic core of the Greater
Bay Area, in an active downtown financial district. Overlooking
an expansive public plaza, with southerly and easterly exposures, the
location provides for a high level of aesthetic appeal.
It can be assumed
that the vast majority of patrons would be drawn from the major office
buildings in and around the plaza. Rather than being concealed at
the base of a corridor of buildings, the site is in clear view of adjacent
high-rises. Thousands of office workers will literally look directly
across, and down, to the site throughout their workday.
Design –
The host building is of vintage design, unique and appealing. Completely
restored with the major portion of the original exterior intact, the structure
stands out from office buildings in the area. Inside, rather than
the simple vanilla shell typical of office building restaurants, the space’s
interior benefits from an attractive structural design. High ceilings
and ground floor reinforcements (crossed I-beams) have been incorporated
into the space for dramatic effect.
Clear lines of
sight and an expansive window line allow sunlight to infuse the space,
providing both practical and aesthetic appeal. Besides the obvious
draw of an open feel and views to an attractive, public space, exposure
to the sun much of the day will reduce reliance on electric light and
heating. In warmer months it is expected that two, or all three,
of the premises’ double doors could be opened for cross ventilation, largely
eliminating the need for air conditioning
Of a total area
of 2,636 feet, current plans now spec 1,155 of that space for dining.
This is perhaps the most substantial negative of the profitability equation
and will be addressed below.
Recommendation
– Further Optimize Basement and Demonstration Kitchen – Use of the lower level could perhaps be better optimized beyond current
plan. Besides storage, office area and current allocation of prep
station, additional prep capacity may be added to accommodate higher volumes
of business. Emphasis should be placed on operating the upper level
demonstration kitchen to the cleanest, highest level of efficiency possible.
The activity and
productivity of the demonstration kitchen will set the tone for the entire
restaurant. Ideally, qualified personnel below would do the vast
majority of prep, enabling line personnel to concentrate on the final
firing of food, showmanship and professional service to wait staff.
If practical,
pivotal upper and lower level food personnel may be equipped with radio
headsets for expeditious communication. Naturally, the dumbwaiter
is integral to the food delivery process.
If exterior food
service is established (see below), and business volume warrants, the
use of 2-3 food runners might also be practical to eliminate congestion
and confusion at the line, a relatively confined area.
Recommendation
– Expand Bar Area – For added capacity, the bar structure could be
lengthened from current beverage station to parallel the entire span of
contiguous wall.
Contingent upon
code compliance, a traditional linear configuration may allow for a narrower
lane between bar and wall-mounted reach-in refrigerators.
This may also open and add floor space for use as lounge and dining area.
Additional bar
service, possibly up to 15 stools, would not only provide a waiting area
and seating for parties of one during lunch, but also greatly enhance
the ambient appeal of the operation as a cocktail hour and evening establishment.
Not to be ignored is the potential for higher-profit revenue from responsible
beverage sales, while building image as a social and business meeting
place. It is the conclusion of this report that to accomplish goals
of enhanced atmosphere and capacity, the bar area must be expanded.
Recommendation
– Create Exterior Service Bar – Contingent upon structural code compliance
and implementation of exterior plan, the overall operation of the entire
establishment would benefit from the creation of a service portal at the
east end of the bar abutting the window line. A service bar opening
to the exterior would allow for more efficient, non-disruptive service
to outside staff. Also worth consideration is the installation of
espresso equipment at or near this opening to allow for coffee bar operation
throughout the day.
The operation
of a clean, simple and high-profit coffee business may prove most important
in the morning hours, when the facility might otherwise not be in operation.
Recommendation
– Leverage Exterior and Expand Capacity – The greatest asset attached
to the project is a location fronting a truly dramatic public space.
This functional and esthetic feature offers a highly viable venue for
exterior dining and entertainment. Contingent upon obtaining
governmental permits and variances, additional public seating may be configured
surrounding the perimeter of premises.
The area fronting
the easterly most window line, more than 60 feet corner-to-corner and
spanning two entries, could be demised to a linear boundary up to 25 feet
from the building. On the other side, at the southerly most window
line, more than 40 feet corner to corner, an area could be demised out
to approximately 14 feet from building perimeter.
Under this plan
the combined exterior area would comprise approximately 2,000 square feet.
This added space could conceivably accommodate up to 100 persons.
Thus, the total service capacity of interior and exterior areas could
approximate 150 patrons.
It is estimated
the exterior operations, if not sheltered, could be effective approximately
75%, about nine months, of the year. If the demised exterior seating
had benefit of canopy enclosure and energy efficient heaters, operations
could take place each day of the year, except in case of severe weather.
Optimally, tables
and chairs would be fixed and of an essentially impervious stone or steel
material. Fixed furnishings would not only alleviate the logistical
concerns of labor and storage, but also enable a rapid deployment
capacity. That is: If weather and business volume permits and service
staff is on hand, the exterior area, or a portion thereof, could be outfitted
for business in short order.
The conclusion
of this report is that added capacity is requisite to the project
turning a profit. Given the limitations of interior seating, the
ability to serve patrons outside is an imperative. Not only food,
but also the ambient enhancement and potentially high profit center of
cocktail service should be fully exploited.
The added draw
of entertainment is obvious to this formula.
Recommendation
– Entertainment – Quality, low volume music resonating across the
urban plaza in the late afternoon could prove to be the most valuable
of promotional measures. Oakland boasts a tradition rich in music,
especially jazz, and an abundance of available performers. The exterior
venue is a natural for showcasing local talent and benefiting not only
customers, but also the passing public.
An option worth
considering is the practical and inexpensive staffing of a talented
soloist for limited hours on Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday. On Thursday,
Friday and possibly Saturday, a qualified jazz trio, as
example, would likely prove a substantial draw from cocktail hour into
the evening. (It should be noted, however, that successful operation
on Saturday evenings would likely depend heavily upon a fair level of
promotion.)
Competition
– Within 0.2 miles of the subject site, mid to upscale dining options
are limited, and only two Italian-style restaurants are currently in operation
in the immediate vicinity: Pasta Cuisine,
0.1 miles at 500 12th Street, suite
#500, and
Da Vinci's Pasta & Pizza, 0.2 miles
at 1814 Franklin Street. Da Vinci’s
is casual dining not meeting comparable criteria, and Pasta Cuisine does
not posses a liquor license, nor does the location have the appeal of
the subject site.
Perhaps the most
comparable operation within 0.2 miles is Max’s Diner. At 0.1 miles from
the subject location, with a full bar, Max’s is casual with a level of
interior improvements mid to upscale in value. During weekday lunch
hours, 11:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m., the operation runs at full capacity, with
a 15 to 30 minute wait being the norm.
According to interviewed
staff and management, during lunch Max’s generates an average of 2.5
turns. That is: the dining room seats to full capacity approximately
2.5 times. The restaurant additionally does a fair level of business
during cocktail hour, with lesser dinner activity during the limited hours
of 4:00 to 7:00 p.m. For both lunch and dinner, menu prices
run about $7.00 to $15.00 per entrée.
(For a complete
listing of food operations in the immediate vicinity, see Exhibit E.)
Comparison
to Max’s – It is expected that the subject restaurant will exceed
the quality level of Max’s cuisine at comparable prices during lunch.
The subject restaurant, however, will benefit from a far more open and
attractive location. It can be assumed that dinner hours would be
more extensive at a higher per-patron check average. Cocktail operations
could be well exploited given the appeal of exterior environment.
Recommended
Hours of Operation –
Monday through
Friday –
Morning
– 7:00 to 11:00, service limited to coffee bar and simple pastries.
(Note: Reconfiguration of bar to adjunct exterior at easterly perimeter
of premises may allow for incorporation of a take-way service window if
the premises were otherwise closed.)
Lunch –
11:30 to 3:00, full lunch service with operation of bar as additional
service area.
Cocktail Hour
– 4:30 to 7:30 to include complimentary light appetizers.
Dinner
– 5:00 to 8:00, with later hours on an as needed basis.
Saturday –
6:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m., depending upon level of promotion and resulting
business levels.
Special Events
– To include private parties, corporate functions and operation during
public events on the plaza.
Recommended
Menu Pricing – Suggest a price point conducive with predominant demographics
of workers in market vicinity. Standard lunch items would range
in price from about $6.95 to $12.95; and dinner would range from about
$8.95 to $15.95. A limited presentation of higher-price seasonal
feature items could be included on both lunch and dinner menus.
Recommended
Staffing Levels – At 120-150 seats, during max capacity lunch shift,
8-10 servers, 4-5 bus staff, 1-2 bartender/servers, comparative number
of kitchen staff.
________________________________________________________________________
Market Abstract
– Of the more than 80,000 people employed in the immediate area, many
occupy the 3-million square foot City Center complex, of which Frank Ogawa
Plaza is a part. This includes the headquarters of Clorox, Merrill
Lynch, Deloitte & Touche, Nextel Communications, APL, Ltd. (American President
Lines) and numerous financial institutions. Also nearby is
the Oakland Convention Center, Oakland City Hall, the California State
Building, Marriott Hotel, the U.S. Federal Building, 140 units of market-rate
housing and varying city offices employing more than 6,000 workers.
Average
Daily Traffic Counts – At 14th Street and Broadway:
40,000 pedestrians; 30,000 arrive and depart public transit; 33,040 vehicles.
Access –
Six freeway exits can access the site from I-880, I-980, and I-580.
Also nearby are stops and stations for BART, AC Transit, Amtrak, and the
San Francisco Ferry.
Developments
in Market Vicinity:
-
Rotunda Building,
the $42 million redevelopment of a historic landmark comprising more
than 300,000 square feet of retail and office space.
-
City Administration
Center with 1,000 employees and 40,000 square feet devoted to retail.
-
University
of California Office of the President Building, 225,000 square feet
of space and 900 employees.
-
Elihu Harris
State Building, 750,000 square feet with 2,000 employees.
-
City Administration
Complex housing more than 900 employees
-
Old Town
Square, 100 units of market-rate housing.
-
Key Stone
Hotel at 12th and Broadway
-
The Tribune
Building, in redevelopment to headquarter the Oakland Tribune.
Example
Area Retail and Restaurants:
-
Take Out
Food – Noah’s Bagels, Starbucks, Jamba Juice, Ratto’s Deli, La Salsa
-
Retail
– Sears, Warriors on Broadway, Hit or Miss, Payless Shoe Source,
Smart and Final, Rite Aid, Walgreen’s, Radio Shack, Kinko’s, Waldenbooks
-
Restaurants
– Café Center, Le Cheval, Le Cheneville, Max’s Diner, Battambang,
Café 817, Pacific Coast Brewing Company.
-
Other
– Paramount Theater, U.S. Ice Center, Club One fitness center.
-
Additional – See Exhibit E.
Conclusion –
It is the collective opinion of the contributing
consultants that the project would likely obtain profitability, and prove
a public asset to the immediate market and downtown community, if the
following conditions are met:
1)
Landlord or other party bears the costs of development (see
Exhibits A, B & C –Estimated Development Costs).
2)
Patron capacity is maximized through implementation of an exterior
seating plan.
3)
The bar is configured to maximize capacity and create optimal ambient
conditions for evening and nighttime business.
4)
During evening hours, entertainment, in the form of moderate-volume
quality music, is included in the format no less than three days per week.
5)
The business runs at a high level of
operational efficiency.
6)
Food and beverage operations produce
quality cuisine and deliver a good value to the consumer.
Alternative Concept –
A reduction of overhead and a correlating
increase in profit potential could be achieved by downscaling to a more
casual format with primarily counter and bar service. The expense
of development, décor, furnishings, equipment, food and, most importantly,
ongoing personnel costs would dramatically decrease with the establishment
of, for instance, a high-quality, innovative delicatessen-style restaurant.
Because a deli-style operation typically
generates income primarily during lunch hours, the incorporation of a
morning coffee house format would remain a recommendation under this plan.
Additionally, the inclusion of evening cocktail service, augmented by
non-labor intensive menu offerings, remains an important consideration.
To obtain substantive profitability,
it is estimated that this plan, too, would require an offset of development
costs (see Exhibit C – Estimated Development Costs).
________________________________________________________________________
|
Exhibit A
|
Scenario One
|
|
Abstract Profit / Loss
Estimate
Without Exterior for
Capacity of 56
Monday – Friday
|
|
(Based on high estimate of 40 hours
per week per employee.)
Estimated Personnel
Expense
|
|
Employee
|
Salary/Wage
|
Monthly
Base
|
Misc.
Add-On
|
Monthly Total
|
|
General Manager (1)
|
$48,000
|
$3,954
|
$ 790
|
$4,954
|
|
Chef (1)
|
$48,000
|
$3,954
|
$ 790
|
$4,954
|
|
Assistant Chef (1)
|
$15.00
|
$2,400
|
$ 360
|
$3,400
|
|
Line Cooks (2)
|
$12.00
|
$3,840
|
$ 576
|
$5,040
|
|
Dishwashers (2)
|
$ 9.00
|
$2,880
|
$ 432
|
$4,080
|
|
Bus Staff (2)
|
$ 7.00
|
$1,120
|
$ 168
|
$2,120
|
|
Bartenders (2)
|
$10.00
|
$3,200
|
$ 480
|
$4,200
|
|
Servers (6)
|
$ 6.25
|
$6,000
|
$ 900
|
$7,000
|
|
Estimated Total Employee
Expense
|
$35,748.00
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Monthly Non-Employee
Operational Expense
|
|
|
Item
|
|
Monthly
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Office Supplies / Printing
|
|
$1,200
|
|
$1,200
|
|
Consulting (Training)
|
|
$ 500
|
|
$ 500
|
|
Bank / Credit Card Process
|
|
$2,000
|
|
$2,000
|
|
Legal / Consulting Fees
|
|
$1,000
|
|
$1,000
|
|
Accounting
|
|
$ 500
|
|
$ 500
|
|
Payroll
|
|
$ 300
|
|
$ 300
|
|
Telephone
|
|
$ 200
|
|
$ 200
|
|
Waste Removal
|
|
$ 300
|
|
$ 300
|
|
Energy
|
|
$2,500
|
|
$2,500
|
|
Water
|
|
$ 400
|
|
$ 400
|
|
Linen / Breakage
|
|
$ 700
|
|
$ 700
|
|
Licenses / Permits
|
|
$ 150
|
|
$ 150
|
|
Personal Property Tax
|
|
$ 400
|
|
$ 400
|
|
Business Tax
|
|
$ 100
|
|
$ 100
|
|
General Liability Insurance
|
|
$ 416
|
|
$ 416
|
|
Food / Liquor Cost
|
|
(below)
|
|
0
|
|
Rent
|
|
0
|
|
0
|
|
Estimated Monthly Non-Employee
Operational Expense
|
$10,666.00
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Development
Costs
|
|
|
Item
|
|
Expense
|
|
Monthly Total
|
|
|
Construction / Improvements
|
$812,500
|
|
|
|
FF&E
|
|
$213,000
|
|
|
|
Misc. Utensils and Equipment
|
$ 75,000
|
|
|
|
Working Capital / Reserve
|
|
$ 40,000
|
|
|
|
Training / Recruitment
|
|
$ 20,000
|
|
|
|
Pre-opening Wages
|
|
$
8,937
|
|
|
|
Total Debt Load
|
|
$1,169,447.00
|
|
|
At 7-Year no-interest
amortization:
|
-
|
-
|
- 13,929.99
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit A
|
Scenario One
– Page 2
|
|
Estimated Monthly Non-Employee
Operational Expense
|
$10,666.00
|
|
Estimated Monthly Employee
Expense
|
$35,748.00
|
|
Development Cost Amortization
|
$13,929.99
|
|
Estimated Total Monthly
Personnel / Operational Expense
|
$60,343.99
|
|
Estimated Income
|
|
|
Item
|
Avg. Check
|
Daily
|
Monthly
|
|
|
Lunch (2.5 turns) 140
covers
|
$13
|
$1,820
|
$36,400
|
|
|
Dinner
(1 turn)
56 covers
|
$19
|
$1,064
|
$21,280
|
|
|
Cocktail Hour Est. at
30 Patrons
|
$ 7.50
|
$225
|
$4,500
|
|
|
Estimated Total Income
|
|
|
$62,180.00
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scenario One Profit
& Loss Summary
|
|
|
Monthly
|
|
Total Estimated Income
|
|
|
$62,180.00
|
|
Food & Liquor Costs
(est. at 30% of income)
|
|
(18,654.00)
|
|
Personnel / Operational
Costs
|
|
|
(60,343.99)
|
|
Estimated Profit / Loss
(net of sales tax)
|
|
($16,817.99)
|
|
Exhibit B
|
Scenario Two
|
|
Abstract Profit / Loss
Estimate
Utilizing Exterior for
Capacity of 120,
Monday – Friday
|
|
(Based on high estimate of 40 hours
per week per employee.)
Estimated Personnel
Expense
|
|
Employee
|
Salary/Wage
|
Monthly
Base
|
Misc.
Add-On
|
Monthly Total
|
|
General Manager (1)
|
$48,000
|
$ 3,954
|
$ 790
|
$ 4,744
|
|
Assistant Manager (1)
|
$38,000
|
$ 3,123
|
$ 624
|
$ 3,747
|
|
Chef (1)
|
$48,000
|
$ 3,954
|
$ 790
|
$ 4,744
|
|
Assistant Chef (1)
|
$15.00
|
$ 2,400
|
$ 360
|
$ 2,760
|
| |